| Trevor Leeper writes: Mr. Watson [regarding: letter to editor, Oct. 24, 2013http://www.clarendonlive.com/?p=14802], KCDB Channel 11 out of Lubbock, Texas, did a great story on the matter. Try going to Google and searching “Dry v. Wet Counties” and see what comes up. The only crime that was higher in wet counties was domestic violence. You stated statistics of how many alcohol related deaths and accidents there were, but you’re not comparing them to anything. How many of those were in wet counties versus dry? As we’re coming into the final days of voting, something I want to remind everyone in Donley County is this. Don’t let this decision divide our county or town. We are lucky to live in a country where we have the freedom to vote for what we want! Don’t “hate” someone for not having the same opinion as yourself. Don’t stop shopping at a store who supports something you don’t. Drinking alcohol will not make you a bad person. I don’t drink, and never will; but if it will help our local businesses and economy, I’m all for it! I love our town, and I know everyone voting against alcohol loves it too. Remember: John 2:1-11 Jesus turned water into wine. On November 5th, you can to! | Will Thompson writes: Roger, are you charging me and those that speak out against the expansion of alcohol sales with the suppression of free speech? From my understanding of your column [October 24, 2013October 24, 2013], you make the ridiculous charge that the “naysayers” are abridging free speech by advocating their position; a charge that could be viewed as being offensive. For some of us “naysayers” who swore an oath to protect our Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic I find that charge is a very low blow. As for me and my experience, protecting free speech was not some lesson I heard in a high school government class. It was something actively lived, a solemn promise; so your charge that I have sought to revoke this oath is not taken lightly. It seems that it might be some on the other side that are actively abridging free speech and violating federal laws by yanking up the yard sides of those opposing the expansion of alcohol sales within our county, my missing sign being one of them. You might want to rethink that article about those suppressing free speech and who are intolerant of other viewpoints. | Chris Moore writes: I’ll pay $200 dollars for information leading to arrest and conviction of the coward(s) who are trespassing on people’s property and stealing their “VOTE NO to ALCOHOL” signs. I hope this is being reported as to what one side of the issue has stooped to. Let me say that you represent your side well with your actions. If you have information that would lead to the arrest and conviction of the punk(s), please contact me or the Sheriff’s office. Thank you. Editor’s Note: The Clarendon Enterprise will match Mr. Moore’s $200 reward. Theft of any kind is abhorrent, and theft of a political sign has an affront to free speech which cannot be tolerated. People on each side of this issue have a right to express their opinion without fear of having their property stolen. |
Reader Interactions
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The discussion of freedom and free speech is critical to a free community. We all come from different backgrounds and life experiences and therefore have developed points of view that are different. If we all had the same mind set we would be exposed to a Hitler kind of existence where mind control was central.
As has been said we all don’t agree but we all enjoy the right to disagree.